Replaced By Or With
Replace WITH Or Replace BY: Here's The Correct Version ... - Grammarhow
When you’re not the one doing the replacing, and one thing isn’t broken, you can use either “replaced with” or “replaced by”. However, when you’re talking about someone else doing the replacing then thing A was replaced BY the person. If it’s broken, you replace it WITH a new one. And if you do it, you say “I replaced X WITH Y”.
https://grammarhow.com/replace-with-or-by/word choice - "Replace with" versus "replace by" - English Language ...
"By" only seems reasonable in passive, although "with" sounds like it would there work too: That component was replaced by this one. That component was replaced with this one.
https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/151309/replace-with-versus-replace-by
Replace WITH or BY? - MyEnglishTeacher.eu Blog
Both with and by may be used together with the verb replace. These are the most common structures: Active: something/somebody replaces something/somebody. Computers cannot replace teachers. A new version will soon replace the current software. Mrs Evans replaced the previous manager. Active: replace something/somebody with something/somebody.
https://www.myenglishteacher.eu/blog/replace-with-or-by/
replaced by or replaced with - Pain in the English
a) I replaced the old rug with a new one. -> The old rug was replaced with a new one. b) Plastic bags replaced paper bags. -> Paper bags were replaced by plastic bags. So, the question is NOT "with" vs "by". The real question is whether A) Somebody replaces X with Y. or B) Y replaces X.
https://painintheenglish.com/case/5009/
replaced by or Replaced with? - TextRanch
replaced by is the most popular phrase on the web. More popular! replaced by 90,800,000 results on the web Some examples from the web: Love was gone, replaced by blood. Sounds like my life except the crying is replaced by whiskey and black rage. Directive 96/74/EC has been repealed and replaced by Directive 2008/121/EC.
https://textranch.com/64961/replaced-by/or/replaced-with/replaced with or replaced by | WordReference Forums
If you are referring to replacing something that is broken, old, or not working/inoperative, then you replace it with a new one. If you are referring to filling the role of someone or something with a substitute, then it is ' replaced by'. "Human bank tellers have all but been replaced by ATMs."
https://forum.wordreference.com/threads/replaced-with-or-replaced-by.1985166/
Is it 'replaced with' or 'replaced by'? - Quora
“Replaced with” is often times acceptable when you replace an object with another that is not similar in quality. For example: I replaced the book with a pen On the other hand, “replaced by” is an passive expression. It's often used when the subject is acted upon by the verb of the sentence.
https://www.quora.com/Is-it-replaced-with-or-replaced-by
Replaced By Or Replaced With? - englishforums.com
Which is the preposition that should follow "replaced", by or with? (When "replace" means "substitute"). Both are often possible and often used. However, I think there are differences with regard to the presence of an 'agent' of the action. Employees were replaced with robots. Robots were clearly not the agent. Soemone else did the replacing.
https://www.englishforums.com/English/ReplacedByOrReplacedWith/bxqzp/post.htm
british english - "replace by" Vs "replace with" - English Language ...
1 Answer. There are already numerous discussions on Quora and Stackexchange about "replace by" vs "replace with". You may like to take a look at those. The rule seems to be the following: If you are using the active voice, and referring to objects, then "with": Tom replaced the TV with a newer one. If you are using the passive voice, and ...
https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/192010/replace-by-vs-replace-with
british english - replaced with and replaced by - English Language ...
With: Some third party, acting as a causal agent, replaced something with something else. For your example, you could use either. Using “replaced by eggs” does imbue eggs with a level of autonomy that they don’t possess, but in such a formal sentence, it would be interpreted as merely a figure of speech.
https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/253604/replaced-with-and-replaced-by